Customize service contracts explains how you can configure fields on inbound ports. If the service doesn't support the fields you need (unfortunately I don't have any AX 2012 to consult), first thing about whether there isn't a reason for it. If you decide to change it, you should learn a bit about how AIF document services are developed. Creating New Document Services is a good starting point. When you update the query (if needed), you can follow steps documented in How to: Update a Service After Adding a Query Data Source .
↧
Forum Post: RE: Several properties in the AX tables don't appear in the proxy code generated from AccountsPayableServices wsdl
↧
Forum Post: RE: Posting payment journal with customer payments
Hi Ludwig, Actually this issue is related with thousands of records so that's why we're looking for correction through job process
↧
↧
Forum Post: Invoice Proposal record on Project disappearing after credit limit error ax 2012 r2
Hi , I had a customer with credit limit 100$. I created a project and created fee journal for 200$ for the project. I click on Invoice proposal for project and i can see the record for 200$ and when i tried to post invoice -it throwed an error credit limit is 100 and you can't do invoice for 200$. So i closed that form. Went back to customer and changed the credit limit to 300$. Then i went to back to invoice proposal on screen and now i dont see the record for 200$. It disappeared. I tried with 2 or 3 projects and this keeps happening. Can you please let me know how can i get that record back once i increase the credit limit? AX 2012 R2 ; Project management and accounting ; invoice proposal; credit limit; customer;
↧
Forum Post: RE: Want to add a check box on a form and when the check box is checked , One field will enable on the form below the check box.
Then yes, the code above will work. Just don't forget that you need to call the same thing from active() as well, therefore you should extract it to a separate method. Like this: void enableFields() { SST_CustIDDetails_ds.object(fieldNum(SST_CustIDDetails, CustName)).enabled(SST_CustIDDetails.Payed_sst); }
↧
Forum Post: RE: SSRS: How Can I Get The Original Invoice ID From a Credit Invoice?
Actually using SalesLine.ReturnInventTransID is not correct since this table only has SalesID number and it can't lead me to the correct invoice id if the sales order has multiple invoices.... What should I do?
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Invoice Proposal record on Project disappearing after credit limit error ax 2012 r2
I can go to Project Management and Accounting > Post Project Invoice Proposal to find out the one which disappeared from Invoice Proposal screen and i can do invoice from there. But i would like to know why does it disappear? Is it standard functionality? what is the reason.
↧
Blog Post: HGTV and ERP Project Change Orders
A good friend of mine loves HGTV, to the point where it is always running in the background…sort of like ESPN at my house but without the daily Top Ten Plays. If you are not familiar with HGTV, it is an American basic cable and satellite television ...read more
↧
Forum Post: RE: AX2009 client extremely slow on Windows10
AX2009 is not even supported on Windows 10. So you might find other issues besides the performance.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Using X++ to manually adjust the tax value inside Sales/ Purch lines during invoice stage
Hi Lincoln, taxRegulationDetail = TaxRegulation::newTaxRegulation(salesTotals.tax()); In the above line you mention has a casting problem. Can you please tell how you acheived. Thanks AX User
↧
↧
Forum Post: Another step into problem while debugging
I am using 7.3 update 12 and trying to debug static method on custom class. I am calling this method from Data Entity and when I try to debug and step into the method Source not Available message appears( It does stop at the data entity and it has worked before but somehow not anymore). I tried a couple steps suggested in this forum and even recreate the model but still no luck. Is there anything I can do?
↧
Forum Post: RE: SSRS: How Can I Get The Original Invoice ID From a Credit Invoice?
Hi Momochi, If they are manually creating a negative line on the Sales order, AX does not know they are crediting the first invoice on that Sales order. There is no way to mark that this negative line is for the invoice on that same sales order..... except that they are on the same sales order. So, if that is the normal process, you could just look for other Invoices with the same SalesId. Alternatively, there are other ways to create the credit. If the negative line is created using the Create -> Credit note function, or if a Return order is used, and if the 'Find a sales order' function is used, then user will select a previous invoice which they wish to raise a credit for. In this case, if you examine the lines of the new sales line or Return order, you might find that: • SalesLine.InventTransIdReturn contains the LotId of the original Sales line. • SalesLine.RefReturnInvoiceTrans_W contains the RecId of the original Customer Invoice line.
↧
Forum Post: Looking for Dynamics Ax 2009 SP1 RU5 download
Hi, For a client I need to install a new server with Dynamics Ax 2009 SP1 RU5. The previous partner doesn't have any of the original installation files so I am looking for them to download myself. I already have the installation disc for Ax 2009 and the update to SP1, but the update to RU5 I don't have. On the partnersource I have found the link to the correct hotfix RU support.microsoft.com/.../982812 but this is giving me a 404. I have called the local support desk in the Netherlands but they say because the website is maintained by another department they cannot help me. The employee advised me to come to TechNet and ask if there is someone who still has the installation file and can share this with me. TechNet sent met here. I hoop the hotfix rollup is still in someone's archive, if so please let me know. Thanks in advance, Remco
↧
Forum Post: RE: AX Financial Dimension posting
Hi, You can try removing the findims inherited from the finished product into the production order. If that's not going to do the job them you might have to consider using bi for analyzing your data. Regards Ludwig
↧
↧
Forum Post: financial distribution is duplicated
Dears : I have a problem with a total purchase order invoice The financial distribution is 200% visible and thus doubled the inventory values and the customer's account This is an invoice for more than a purchase order What is the reason why the financial distribution is duplicated? Is there a solution in this invoice?
↧
Forum Post: RE: Posting payment journal with customer payments
Hi Ludwig, Any input for the above post-we need to process huge records by reading the data's from Xcel where we've the list of SO ID's and it's related details for which the system has created the duplicate transactions
↧
Forum Post: RE: Product Receipt Voucher _ huge value
Hi André i checked there is no negative inventory the problem is in second voucher this voucher is for product receipts why material cost appear in the voucher
↧
Blog Post: Implementing D365 for F&O? – Get the Right SMEs Involved (Video)
Implementing D365 for F&O? – Get the Right SMEs Involved (Video) Read Next: 18 Warning Signs Your Business Need the Cloud This post first appeared first on Encore Business Solutions . ...read more
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: Why is mrp generating unnecessary unplanned orders?
Magic and Colby, Sorry for the late reply. We figured it out last week thanks to both your recommendations, and then I got sick over the weekend till now, and finally feel up to writing you both a thoughtful reply. We likely still have settings that are not ideal, but it's giving us the output we were expecting (at least, with what we've encountered so far). I want this thread to be a source of info for future users. When we turned on mrp, we had work orders that were back-scheduling a few months. We researched and found that we should set capacity to zero. Then work orders only back-scheduled the sum of the lead time in the default settings (three days). While researching that, we came across a recommendation to set the Fulfill Minimum for purchase orders to Today+Procurement time. The author said he didn't use it for work orders, but didn't say why. We changed it for purchase orders, and that solved some problems. Then we decided to do the same for work orders. That caused a problem that we didn't understand at first. That caused mrp to create work orders that pegged to safety stock in the near future, and future work orders to peg to orders due this month. We switched work orders back to Fulfill Minimum = Today, and then mrp assigned the first released work orders to the first demand, and it worked the way we expected. Always fulfilling the customer need first, and safety stock last. If your business process is to always ship from safety stock, then I guess today+procurement time would work for you. But we want to ship our orders first, even if we have to deplete safety stock to zero. We were also generating extra orders because our coverage period was too large. The parts already had the correct lead time, and almost all have a safety stock and an order minimum on them, so we didn't need to order per a large period. We set the coverage period in the coverage group to 7, and everything aligned. We did find that this generated many small orders, but that was solved by just raising the minimum order (to essentially what the period requirement was in our old system). We did truncate (not delete; truncate is faster, just 1-2 seconds) the reqtrans table, but that didn't solve our problem. The Fulfill Minimum = Today solved it. (Our specific problem for that involved a planned work order.) The one thing we're still not sure about is the dynamic negative days settings. Everything we read said turn that on, and that was on from day 1. If we do that, do we still need negative days on the individual coverage groups? Is dynamic negative days an override, or a supplement, to the coverage group negative days? We turned off dynamic negative days, and set coverage group negative days to 950. We don't see a problem (yet). Most of our parts are custom, and we write POs with scheduled deliveries that sometimes go out 13-18 months. We have had one part with a 2-year lead time. We do want mrp to see these POs, and tell us to accelerate delivery rather than place a new PO. Hence our coverage period and negative/positive days go out this far. We run mrp at night, so any extra computer time is a non-issue right now. I want to thank both of you for your help. It helped us in the debugging. Given that we have 3,000 active parts, I won't be surprised if the buyers encounter a part that doesn't behave as expected, but I think we can adjust the appropriate settings at this point.
↧
Forum Post: RE: Invoice Proposal record on Project disappearing after credit limit error ax 2012 r2
Hello DynamicsAXExplorer, Based on what you describe, it looks that you receive an error once the credit limit is exceeded and that the whole process is canceled. Have you tested setting your credit limit check to warning? Does that make a difference? The workaround is obviously creating a new invoice proposal. It should take you only two clicks and from my perspective this is a reasonable "workaround". Best regards, Ludwig
↧
Forum Post: RE: Looking for Dynamics Ax 2009 SP1 RU5 download
Hello Remco, I would suggest opening an official support request. MS should be able to help you with that download issue. Best regards, Ludwig
↧